Management and outcomes of acute appendicitis in children during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis
link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on link.springer.com ↗Article · Nov 2023 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
This systematic review examines how COVID-19 pandemic affected pediatric appendicitis management across 36 studies (32,704 patients). Despite longer diagnostic delays and increased complicated appendicitis rates during the pandemic, post-operative complication rates remained unchanged, suggesting effective clinical adaptation to pandemic constraints.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the way to manage the emergencies, as people faced fear of the hospitals, with possible delay in the diagnosis. Moreover, clinicians had to rearrange protocols for diagnosis and treatment. We aimed to assess whether COVID-19 pandemic influenced severity of inflammation, management, and outcomes of acute appendicitis (AA), when compared to the pre-COVID era. Using defined search strategy, two independent investigators identified those studies comparing pediatric AA during COVID-19 pandemic versus the pre-COVID-19 period. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3. Data are mean ± SD. Of 528 abstracts, 36 comparative studies were included (32,704pts). Time from symptoms onset to surgery was longer during the pandemics compared to the pre-COVID-19 (1.6 ± 0.9 versus 1.4 ± 0.9 days; p < 0.00001). Minimally Invasive Surgery was similar during COVID-19 (70.4 ± 30.2%) versus control period (69.6 ± 25.3%; p = ns). Complicated appendicitis was increased during the pandemics (35.9 ± 14.8%) compared to control period (33.4 ± 17.2%; p < 0.0001). Post-operative complications were comparable between these two groups (7.7 ± 6.5% versus 9.1 ± 5.3%; p = ns). It seems that the COVID-19 pandemic influenced the time of diagnosis, severity of inflammation, and type of surgery. However, the number of post-operative complications was not different between the two groups, leading to the conclusion that the patients were correctly managed.
Level of Evidence
Level 3 Meta-analysis on Level 3 studies