StayCurrentMD · Longitudinal Analysis of Pulmonary Function in Survivors of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.
Article1 min read·Published Jan 2020Older

Longitudinal Analysis of Pulmonary Function in Survivors of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.

bit.ly shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on bit.ly ↗

Article · Jan 2020 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Longitudinal study of 119 CDH survivors shows declining pulmonary function with age, particularly in patients with larger defects (C/D) and those requiring oxygen at discharge. Findings suggest CDH survivors need ongoing respiratory monitoring to detect and manage progressive pulmonary complications.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze longitudinal trends of pulmonary function testing in patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) followed in our multidisciplinary clinic.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of CDH patients born between 1991 and 2013. A linear mixed effects model was fitted to estimate the trends of percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1pp), percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVCpp), and FEV1/FVC over time.

RESULTS: Of 268 patients with CDH who survived to discharge, 119 had at least 1 pulmonary function test study. The FEV1pp (P < .001), FVCpp (P = .017), and FEV1/FVC (P = .001) decreased with age. Compared with defect size A/B, those with defect size C/D had lower FEV1pp by an average of 11.5% (95% CI, 2.9%-20.1%; P = .010). A history of oxygen use at initial hospital discharge also correlated with decreased FEV1pp by an average of 8.0% (95% CI, 1.2%-15.0%; P = .023).

CONCLUSIONS: In a select cohort of CDH survivors, average pulmonary function declines with age relative to expected population normative values. Those with severe CDH represent a population at risk for worsening pulmonary function test measurements who may benefit from recognition and monitoring for complications.

doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.09.072

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →