Long-term Outcomes and Satisfaction Rates after Costal Cartilage Resection for Slipping Rib Syndrome
jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗Article · Jan 2021 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
Long-term follow-up study of 49 pediatric patients undergoing costal cartilage resection for slipping rib syndrome demonstrates high efficacy with 72% reporting complete cure and 83% satisfaction rates above 7/10 at median 4.5-year follow-up. Recurrence occurred in 11 patients due to residual cartilage or rib hypermobility, supporting surgical intervention as effective treatment for patients failing conservative management.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Abstract
Purpose
Slipping rib syndrome (SRS) is a challenging and underdiagnosed condition. We previously demonstrated the efficacy of costal cartilage resection for SRS and now report long-term follow-up of our updated cohort.
Methods
Retrospective chart review with prospective telephone follow-up was performed for 30 previously analyzed patients and 22 new patients to elucidate risk factors for recurrence, discuss preoperative experience, current symptoms, postoperative course, and satisfaction.
Results
From 2006–2020, 49 patients met inclusion criteria and underwent 67 operations. Eleven underwent re-operation for recurrence, with median time of 1.6 years [1.2, 2.6]. Median age of symptom onset was 13 years [11,14] while median age at diagnosis was 15.4 years [14, 16.7]. 29/49 (59%) patients were contacted, with median follow-up of 4.5 years [2.1, 5.7]. Twenty-one patients (72%) reported complete cure, 20 (69%) reported satisfaction 10/10, with 83% rating their satisfaction >7/10. Eleven patients (38%) were offered opioids for pain control prior to surgical evaluation. Patients with recurrence had residual or fused cartilage, hypermobile bony ribs, or both, at re-excision.
Conclusions
Costal cartilage resection is an effective treatment for SRS with high satisfaction rates and an appropriate consideration for patients who fail conservative management.
Level of Evidence: Level IV; Case series with no comparison groups