Litigation Involving Pediatric Surgical Conditions
jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗Article · Sep 2019 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
Analysis of 170 malpractice cases involving pediatric surgical conditions from 1965-2017 reveals appendicitis and circumcision account for nearly one-third of litigation. Most common allegations include delayed diagnosis (45.9%), technical complications (35.9%), and perioperative negligence (23.6%), with outcomes split between defendants and plaintiffs.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Purpose
Malpractice litigation among pediatric surgeons is a subject of concern and interest, but minimal factual data are known. Our goal was to investigate national litigation trends regarding pediatric surgical conditions.
Methods
We queried WestlawNext database for malpractice cases involving pediatric (age ≤ 18) surgical conditions. Cases were included if they named a care provider or health center. We gathered data on diagnoses, procedures, care providers, allegations, location, and outcomes.
Results
Our search revealed 4754 cases, and 170 met inclusion criteria. These ranged from 1965 to 2017 and represented 40 states. 110 cases involved a surgeon (41% pediatric surgeons). Appendicitis was the most common diagnosis identified. Cases frequently involved delayed/missed diagnoses or interventions (45.9%), technical concerns (35.9%), mortalities (26.5%), negligent perioperative care (23.6%), and informed consent concerns (4.7%). Technical complication was the most common allegation against surgeons (49.1%), and nonsurgeon cases typically involved a delayed/missed diagnosis (78.3%). 39% of cases resulted in favor of the defendant, 35% plaintiff, and 14% had a split verdict.
Conclusion
Litigation involving pediatric surgical conditions is diverse, but appendicitis and circumcision comprise almost a third of cases. A greater understanding of these trends can help steer efforts in quality and safety as well as guide improved communication with families.
Level of evidence
N/A