StayCurrentMD · Letter to the Editor
Article1 min read·Published Nov 2018Older

Letter to the Editor

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Nov 2018 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Critical commentary on a published root cause analysis reporting an unusually high 29% surgical site infection rate following pectus repairs. The authors raise methodological concerns about reporting retrospective complication reviews as prospective studies and note the infection rate significantly exceeds established benchmarks in the pectus literature.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

We reviewed with concern the article by Apelt et al. [1]. They report their root cause analysis of increased surgical site infections after their pectus repairs. From a scientific standpoint, reporting a root cause analysis as a “study” severely jeopardizes equipoise as an increased rate of complication is known a priori. In 21 cases, they experienced 6 (29%) infections. This would be the single highest infectious complication rate reported in the pectus literature, and inconsistent with prior publications.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →