StayCurrentMD · Laparoscopic versus Open Pyloromyotomies: Outcomes and Disparities in Pyloric Stenosis
Article1 min read·Published Jan 2022Older

Laparoscopic versus Open Pyloromyotomies: Outcomes and Disparities in Pyloric Stenosis

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Jan 2022 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Nationwide analysis of 30,915 pyloromyotomies for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis reveals low complication rates but notable socioeconomic disparities in outcomes. Patients from low-income households showed higher rates of malnutrition and weight loss at readmission, highlighting equity gaps in postoperative care and follow-up.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Purpose

Pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) is one of the most common non-elective operations performed in the neonatal period. This project aims to explore outcomes of pyloromyotomy and compare differences between laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomies in newborns diagnosed with HPS.

Methods

The Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) from 2010-2014 was queried to identify patients diagnosed with HPS that underwent repair.

Results

In total, 30,915 children (18% female) underwent pyloromyotomy for HPS. Median length of stay for index admission was 2 days. A total of 212 (0.7%) patients required a redo pyloromyotomy. 127 (60%) were performed during index admission. Readmission rate at 30 days was 3% and 5% at one year, and 22% presented to a different hospital. The most common indications for readmission were feeding intolerance (24%), dehydration (10%), and malnutrition (10%). Patients from low-income households were more likely to present with malnutrition and weight loss (9% vs 4%, p

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →