StayCurrentMD · Indirect Evidence for the Volume–Outcome Relationship in Corrective Surgery for Hirschsprung Disease: Insights from Adult Colorectal Surgery
Article1 min read·Published Feb 2026

Indirect Evidence for the Volume–Outcome Relationship in Corrective Surgery for Hirschsprung Disease: Insights from Adult Colorectal Surgery

dx.doi.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on dx.doi.org ↗

Article · Feb 2026 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This study evaluates whether the established volume-outcome relationship in adult colorectal cancer surgery applies to corrective surgery for Hirschsprung disease in children. Using a systematic framework, expert consensus found strong support for transferability despite population differences, reinforcing that higher surgical volumes correlate with better outcomes in this rare pediatric condition.

  • Volume-outcome relationship from adult colorectal cancer surgery appears transferable to pediatric Hirschsprung corrective surgery despite population differences.
  • Tissue sampling and frozen-section pathology during Hirschsprung surgery present unique diagnostic challenges that may strengthen the volume-outcome link.
  • Expert consensus identified disease characteristics, comorbidities, intervention type, follow-up, and concomitant treatments as irrelevant to transferability.
  • No consensus reached on specific caseload thresholds for Hirschsprung surgery, though institutional experience clearly impacts outcomes.
  • Surgical complexity and institutional experience mechanisms are comparable between adult colorectal and pediatric Hirschsprung procedures.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Hirschsprung disease (HD) is a rare malformation that requires complex corrective surgery. Low caseload, heterogeneous patient cohorts, and difficulties in linking long-term outcomes to the initial corrective surgery limit the available direct evidence for a volume-outcome relationship. Indirect evidence from adult colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery may be transferable, given the partial similarity of the procedures.Using the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) V24–07 rapid report's methodology, this study evaluated the transferability of the volume–outcome relationship from adult CRC surgery to corrective surgery for HD in children. Differences between the two populations were identified and rated for their effect on the transferability of the volume–outcome relationship by an expert panel, following predefined IQWiG V24–07 categories.Consensus was reached for 6 out of 12 criteria. For “disease characteristics,” “comorbidities,” “intervention,” “follow-up,” and “concomitant treatments,” differences were deemed irrelevant to transferability. For “diagnosis,” differences were considered to increase procedural complexity in HD, thereby reinforcing the volume–outcome relationship. Tissue sampling and frozen-section pathology were identified as key challenges. Differences of opinion arose for the remaining criteria, particularly concerning whether the transferability of evidence is limited to rectal resections in adults or includes all colorectal resections. No consensus could be reached on the appropriate caseload threshold for corrective surgery for HD in children.Using the IQWiG V24–07 framework, this study provides strong support for the transferability of the volume–outcome relationship from adult colorectal surgery to corrective surgery for HD. Despite population differences, the underlying mechanisms linking surgical complexity and institutional experience are comparable, reinforcing the relevance of volume-based quality control in pediatric surgery.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →