Improving the diagnostic accuracy of appendicitis using a multidisciplinary pathway
jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗Article · Feb 2020 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
Post-implementation audit of a multidisciplinary diagnostic pathway for pediatric appendicitis using Alvarado Score risk stratification and protocolized ultrasound. The pathway achieved 91% diagnostic accuracy and reduced negative appendectomy rates by 67% without requiring CT scans, demonstrating effective quality improvement in emergency department diagnosis.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Background/Purpose
Improvement opportunities exist in the accuracy and timeliness of the diagnosis of childhood appendicitis. The purpose of our study was to conduct a post-implementation audit of a diagnostic pathway for children with suspected appendicitis presenting to our pediatric emergency department.
Methods
We adopted a diagnostic pathway that utilized a validated risk of appendicitis stratification tool (Alvarado Score) with protocolized use of abdominal ultrasound for moderate risk patients. We conducted a 10% convenience sample audit of pathway patients treated over the subsequent 18-month period. Outcome measures included false negative and positive rates, sensitivity, specificity, and overall pathway accuracy.
Results
One hundred thirty-four pathway patients, of which 22 (16.4%) had appendicitis confirmed pathologically, were evaluated. The risk group distribution of patients was: low risk (29%), moderate risk (60%), and high risk (11%). The negative appendectomy rate was 4.4% (reduced from 14% pre-pathway), and the false negative (missed appendicitis) rate was 3.0%. No patients received CT scans. Pathway sensitivity was 81.8%% (95% CI 59.7% to 94.8%), specificity-92.9%% (95% CI 86.4%–96.9%), and overall accuracy-91.0% (95% CI 84.9%–95.3%).
Conclusion
Implementation of a diagnostic pathway achieved a high level of accuracy and reduced our institutional negative appendectomy rate by 67%. The audit identified additional pathway improvement opportunities.
Levels of Evidence
Level IV.