StayCurrentMD · Impact of prior treatment on long-term outcome of peroral endoscopic myotomy in pediatric achalasia
Article1 min read·Published Jul 2019Older

Impact of prior treatment on long-term outcome of peroral endoscopic myotomy in pediatric achalasia

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Jul 2019 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Retrospective study of 17 pediatric achalasia patients demonstrates 88.2% long-term clinical success with POEM at median 55-month follow-up. Prior treatment with pneumatic dilatation or Heller myotomy did not negatively impact POEM outcomes, supporting its use as both primary and salvage therapy in children.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Background and aim

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is emerging as an effective treatment for achalasia in children. Long-term outcomes of POEM and impact of prior treatment are not known in pediatric population. In this study, we aim to evaluate the long-term efficacy of POEM in children with achalasia.

Methods

Children (≤18 years) with achalasia who underwent POEM and completed at least 36 months of follow-up were included in the study. Long-term clinical success (Eckardt ≤3) was evaluated and compared between treatment naïve versus prior treated cases.

Results

A total of 53 children underwent POEM at our center during the study period. Of these, 17 children completed at least 3 years of follow-up and were included in the study. Eight children had prior treatment including pneumatic dilatation (6), Heller's myotomy (1) and both Heller's myotomy and pneumatic dilatation (1). POEM was successfully completed in all the children. Median procedure duration was 95.76 ± 47.98 min (38–240 min.). Long-term clinical success was found in 88.2% children. The mean follow-up was 55.06 ± 10.65 months (range 36–67 months). There was no significant difference in the success rate between treatment naïve and prior treatment failure cases.

Conclusion

POEM is a safe, effective and durable treatment for achalasia in children. Prior treatment does not affect the outcomes of POEM in children.

Type of study

Retrospective comparative study.

Level of evidence

III.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →