StayCurrentMD · Histrelin implantation in the pediatric population: A 10-year institutional experience
Article1 min read·Published Sep 2018Older

Histrelin implantation in the pediatric population: A 10-year institutional experience

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Sep 2018 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Ten-year retrospective review of 866 histrelin implant procedures in 377 pediatric patients for central precocious puberty and gender dysphoria. Study demonstrates safety of clinic-based insertion and removal, with complications occurring in only 1% of cases and a shift toward outpatient settings over time.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Purpose

To perform the largest review of the safety and clinical management practices of histrelin implantation in children.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed including all patients (age ≤ 20) that underwent histrelin implant insertion, replacement, or removal by a single surgeon at a large pediatric tertiary care center (2008–2017). Data analyzed included patient demographics, procedure details, and complications.

Results

A total of 377 patients, with a mean age of 9.3 ± 2.4 years, underwent 866 unique procedures (352 insertions, 329 replacements, and 185 removals) for a diagnosis of either central precocious puberty (343 patients, 821 cases) or gender identity disorder (34 patients, 45 cases). There were 271 (72%) female patients, 72 (19%) male patients, and 34 (9%) children in gender transition. Procedures were performed in three settings: 415 (47.9%) in the outpatient clinic, 401 (46.3%) in a sedation unit, and 50 (5.8%) in the operating room. The preferred setting shifted over time to more clinic-based procedures (9.4% vs. 62.9% in the first five vs. second five years, respectively). Complications were rare (1% of cases).

Conclusion

Histrelin implantation in the pediatric population is safe, with minimal morbidity. Implantation and removal in the clinic setting are appropriate for the majority of patients.

Level of evidence

Treatment study; Level IV.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →