StayCurrentMD · Height-based formulas for predicting intravascular length of tunnelled neck central venous catheter in paediatric population
Article1 min read·Published Sep 2023Older

Height-based formulas for predicting intravascular length of tunnelled neck central venous catheter in paediatric population

link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on link.springer.com ↗

Article · Sep 2023 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This retrospective study of 124 pediatric patients develops height-based formulas to predict optimal intravascular length for tunneled neck central venous catheters, achieving 70-80% accuracy within 1 cm. The formulas aim to reduce radiation exposure during CVC placement by minimizing fluoroscopy time needed for positioning confirmation.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Introduction

Central venous catheter (CVC) placement is commonly performed in children. We aim to develop simple formulas to predict CVC intravascular length to minimise radiation exposure associated with the procedure.

Methods

124 paediatric patients who received tunnelled neck CVCs and subsequent CT thorax at Hong Kong Children’s Hospital from January 2020 to July 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Formula development cohorts were subdivided by insertion sites—9 right external jugular vein (REJV), 41 right internal jugular vein (RIJV), 14 left external jugular vein (LEJV), 10 left internal jugular vein (LIJV). Using measurements from CT by two radiologists, formulas predicting the CVC intravascular length based on height and insertion sites were developed using a linear regression model. These formulas were tested with validation cohorts (10 randomly selected cases in REJV and RIJV groups respectively). Validation cohorts were not available for LEJV and LIJV groups due to small sample sizes.

Result

The goodness-of-fit (R^2) of all formulas are above 0.8. In the validation cohorts, the REJV formula was predictive of intravascular CVC length within 1 cm in 70% of CVC with mean absolute difference of 0.63 cm (SD 0.48 cm), and the RIJV formula was predictive of intravascular CVC length within 1 cm in 80% of CVC with mean absolute difference of 0.67 cm (SD 0.53 cm).

Conclusion

Intravascular CVC length can be estimated using simple formulas based on height and insertion sites. Further prospective validation of the LEJV and LIJV formulas is needed.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →