StayCurrentMD · Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase has different efficacy on biliary atresia diagnosis in different hospital patient groups: an application of machine learning approach
Article1 min read·Published Jun 2022Older

Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase has different efficacy on biliary atresia diagnosis in different hospital patient groups: an application of machine learning approach

link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on link.springer.com ↗

Article · Jun 2022 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This study uses machine learning to demonstrate that GGT's diagnostic accuracy for biliary atresia varies significantly across patient subgroups defined by hemoglobin levels and gallbladder filling status. Clinicians should interpret GGT results cautiously in subgroups with lower diagnostic efficacy, particularly when hemoglobin exceeds 105 g/L.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Objectives

Gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) is the most widely used biomarker in the early diagnosis of biliary atresia (BA), but its diagnostic efficacy is questionable in different sub-populations. We aim to identify subgroups that are defined by specific variables with cut-offs and can significantly affect the diagnostic efficacy of GGT for detecting BA.

Methods

Clinical data from 1273 infants with neonatal obstructive jaundice (NOJ) diagnosed between January 2012 and December 2017 at the Children’s Hospital of Fudan University were enrolled, reviewed, and analyzed. Random forest-based Virtual Twins method was used to identify potential subgroups.

Results

Hemoglobin (HGB) and fasting gallbladder filling were selected as defining variables. The diagnostic efficacy of GGT was significantly better (AUC = 0.855) for patients with hemoglobin (HGB) ≤ 105 g/L and a gallbladder that was not or poorly filled. Diagnostic efficacy was worst in the subgroup defined by HGB > 105 g/L (AUC = 0.722). The inclusion of interaction terms between GGT and the subgroups in a logistic regression model significantly improved (p = 0.002) prediction performance.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence that the diagnostic efficacy of GGT can differ significantly across different subgroups. Therefore, a GGT diagnostic result should be interpreted cautiously when patients belong to subgroups with low diagnostic efficacy. The development of a prediction model and/or clinical diagnostic pathway for early detection of BA should also account for the heterogeneous diagnostic efficacy of GGT.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →