StayCurrentMD · Factors that predict the need for early surgeon presence in the setting of pediatric trauma
Article1 min read·Published May 2019Older

Factors that predict the need for early surgeon presence in the setting of pediatric trauma

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · May 2019 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This retrospective study of 526 pediatric trauma patients identifies three key prehospital predictors for immediate surgeon presence: GCS ≤12, penetrating mechanism, and age-adjusted hypotension. The findings suggest these clinical variables outperform ISS alone for trauma activation decisions, with ISS ≥16 showing only 61% sensitivity for predicting need for urgent surgical intervention.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Introduction

Evidence based variables predicting the need for surgeon presence (NSP) on arrival of an injured child are limited. We sought to identify prehospital factors that best correlate with NSP and highest level of activation in pediatric trauma. A secondary analysis was also performed to determine whether injury severity score (ISS) was predictive of NSP in pediatric trauma.

Methods

This was a retrospective, single institution study of injured patients age ≤ 16 years delivered from scene to our Pediatric Level I trauma center between January 2016 and June 2017. 526 patients had complete data available for analysis. NSP was previously described as the presence of any of these factors: intubation, transfusion, emergent operation with the trauma team/craniotomy with the neurosurgery team, vasopressors, interventional radiology, spinal cord Injury, chest tube, emergency department thoracotomy, intracranial pressure monitor, pericardiocentesis, or death in the trauma bay. Multivariable analysis was performed with covariates of interest including scene and ED arrival vitals and interventions.

Results

Independent predictors of NSP and highest level of activation were GCS of ≤12 (OR 22.3), penetrating trauma (OR 5.4), and hypotension (age adjusted) (OR 10.2). We also found that ISS ≥ 16 was a poor indicator of NSP with a sensitivity of only 61%.

Conclusion

A validated model based on these variables may be useful in predicting NSP and highest level of activation prior to arrival of pediatric trauma patients. NSP may augment assessment of over and undertriage in pediatric trauma patients as compared to the ISS/Cribari system alone.

Level of evidence

Level III, retrospective cohort study

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →