StayCurrentMD · Factors affecting mechanical complications of central venous access devices in children
Article1 min read·Published Jul 2022Older

Factors affecting mechanical complications of central venous access devices in children

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗

Article · Jul 2022 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Retrospective study of 317 central venous access devices in 245 children found 17% mechanical complication rate within 6 months, with younger age and lower weight as key risk factors. Hickman lines showed twice the complication rate of implantable ports (26% vs 13%), with fracture and migration being most common failures.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Purpose:Factors leading to mechanical complications following insertion of central venous access devices (CVADs) in children are poorly understood. We aimed to quantify the rates and elucidate the mechanisms of these complications.

Methods:Retrospective (2016-2021) review of children (< 18 years old) receiving a CVAD. Data, reported as number of cases (%) and median (IQR), were analysed by Fisher's exact test, chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis.

Results:In total, 317 CVADs (245 children) were inserted. Median age was 5.0 (8.9) years, with 116 (47%) females. There were 226 (71%) implantable port devices and 91 (29%) Hickman lines. Overall, 54 (17%) lines had a mechanical complication after 0.4 (0.83) years from insertion: fracture 19 (6%), CVAD migration 14 (4.4%), occlusion 14 (4.4%), port displacement 6 (1.9%), and skin tethering to port device 1 (0.3%). Younger age and lower weight were associated with higher risk of complications (p < 0.0001). Hickman lines had a higher incidence of complications compared to implantable port devices [24/91 (26.3%) vs 30/226 (13.3%); p = 0.008].

Conclusion:Mechanical complications occur in 17% of CVADs at a median of < 6 months after insertion. Risk factors include younger age and lower weight. Implantable port devices have a lower complications rate.

DOI: 10.1007/s00383-022-05130-1

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →