StayCurrentMD · Enhancing recovery after minimally invasive surgery in children: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
Article1 min read·Published Apr 2021Older

Enhancing recovery after minimally invasive surgery in children: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Apr 2021 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Systematic review and meta-analysis of 9 studies (531 patients) demonstrates that ERAS protocols after minimally invasive surgery in children significantly reduce hospital length of stay by 1.12 days and decrease 30-day readmission rates from 10% to 4%, without increasing complication rates.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Objective

: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely implemented after minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) in adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current evidence available on ERAS after MIS in children.

Methods

: Using a defined search strategy (PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus), we performed a systematic review of the literature, searching for studies reporting on ERAS after MIS (thoracoscopy, laparoscopy, retroperitoneoscopy) in children (1975-2019). This study was registered with PROSPERO-international prospective register of systematic reviews. A meta-analysis was conducted using comparative studies for length of stay (LOS), complication rates, and readmission rates.

Results

: Of 180 abstracts screened, 20 full-text articles were analyzed, and 9 were included in our systematic review (1 randomized controlled trial, 3 prospective, and 5 retrospective studies), involving a total number of 531 patients. ERAS has been applied to laparoscopy for digestive (n=7 studies) or urologic surgeries (n=1), as well as thoracoscopy (n=1). Mean LOS was decreased in ERAS children compared to controls (6 studies, -1.12 days, 95%IC: -1.5 to -0.82, p<0.00001). There was no difference in complication rates between ERAS children and control children (5 studies, 13% vs 14%, OR=0.84, 95%CI: 0.49-1.44, p=0.52. The 30-day readmission rate was decreased in ERAS children compared to controls (6 studies, 4% vs 10%, OR=0.34, 95%CI: 0.18-0.66, p=0.001).

Conclusions

: Although the evidence regarding ERAS in MIS is scarce, these protocols seem safe and effective, by decreasing LOS and 30-day readmission rate, without increasing post-operative complication rates.

Type of Study

: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Level of Evidence

: Level V

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →