Engaging the Patient and Family in the Surgical Safety Process Utilizing SafeStart
jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗Article · Jun 2019 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
Prospective study of 100 pediatric surgery patients demonstrates that the SafeStart tablet-based application successfully engages parents in surgical safety verification from preoperative visit through OR. Parents preferred this digital approach to standard consent processes, with 96% reporting ease of use and most feeling instrumental in protecting their child's safety.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Background
Owing to the vulnerable nature of children, parental/caregiver engagement in surgical safety is a crucial aspect of care. Historically, the surgical safety process has been isolated from parent involvement. The digital, tablet-based surgical safety application, SafeStart, requires parent participation and provides multiple instances of verification of patient safety information from preoperative clinic visit, to perioperative care, and into the operating room.
Method
The SafeStart application was utilized for 100 pediatric general surgery patients in an IRB approved prospective study. Parent assessments of the surgical consent and safety processes were collected in pre- and postoperative surveys with a 100% response rate. Standard consent forms were used and compared as a control.
Results
Only 31% of parents had knowledge of the surgical safety checklist process prior to their exposure to the study. 96% of the parents reported that the SafeStart patient portal was easy to use. A majority would prefer SafeStart to the standard consent process.
Conclusion
The SafeStart program connected the surgical safety process from the preoperative clinic visit through postoperative care. Parent's preferred SafeStart to the standard surgical safety checklist and consent process, felt that they were instrumental in protecting their child's safety, and would recommend SafeStart for the surgical care of others.
Level of evidence
II