Alberto Tozzi · Digital tools in the informed consent process: a systematic review
Article1 min read·Published Feb 2021Older

Digital tools in the informed consent process: a systematic review

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗

Article · Feb 2021 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This systematic review of 73 studies examines how digital tools—including videos, interactive multimedia, and non-interactive formats—impact the informed consent process in clinical research and practice. The review compares patient understanding, satisfaction, and participation rates between digital and traditional consent methods from 2012-2020.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Alberto Tozzi

Background: Providing understandable information to patients is necessary to achieve the aims of the Informed Consent process: respecting and promoting patients' autonomy and protecting patients from harm. In recent decades, new, primarily digital technologies have been used to apply and test innovative formats of Informed Consent. We conducted a systematic review to explore the impact of using digital tools for Informed Consent in both clinical research and in clinical practice. Understanding, satisfaction and participation were compared for digital tools versus the non-digital Informed Consent process. Methods: We searched for studies on available electronic databases, including Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. Studies were identified using specific Mesh-terms/keywords. We included studies, published from January 2012 to October 2020, that focused on the use of digital Informed Consent tools for clinical research, or clinical procedures. Digital interventions were defined as interventions that used multimedia or audio-video to provide information to patients. We classified the interventions into 3 different categories: video only, non-interactive multimedia, and interactive multimedia. Results: Our search yielded 19,579 publications. After title and abstract screening 100 studies were retained for full-text analysis, of which 73 publications were included. Studies examined interactive multimedia (29/73), non-interactive multimedia (13/73), and videos (31/73), and most (34/38)

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →