StayCurrentMD · Diagnostic efficacy of high-frequency ultrasound and X-ray contrast enema in colonic strictures after necrotizing enterocolitis: a retrospective study
Article1 min read·Published Dec 2022Older

Diagnostic efficacy of high-frequency ultrasound and X-ray contrast enema in colonic strictures after necrotizing enterocolitis: a retrospective study

link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on link.springer.com ↗

Article · Dec 2022 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This retrospective study of 81 pediatric patients compares high-frequency ultrasound versus X-ray contrast enema for detecting colonic strictures following necrotizing enterocolitis. Both modalities showed similar diagnostic efficacy (AUC 0.990 vs 0.938), supporting ultrasound as a viable alternative for post-NEC stricture evaluation.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Objective

To compare the efficacy of high-frequency ultrasound and X-ray contrast enema in the diagnosis of colonic strictures after necrotizing enterocolitis.

Methods

This study included pediatric patients who developed progressive abdominal distension or constipation after conservative treatment for necrotizing enterocolitis at our hospital between June 2012 and April 2020. All patients had high-frequency ultrasounds and X-ray contrast enema, and we used surgery, pathology, and telephone return visits as the reference standard. Patients with colonic strictures were confirmed by surgery and pathology. A patient was considered without colonic stricture if no stricture was reported or did not have related symptoms during telephone return visits. The areas under the Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used as evaluation indexes to compare the differential efficacy of high-frequency ultrasound and X-ray contrast enema.

Results

A total of 81 patients have been included in this study. Among them, 49 patients were diagnosed with colonic strictures after necrotizing enterocolitis. The AUCs for high-frequency ultrasound and X-ray contrast enema were 0.990 vs 0.938, respectively (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

The diagnostic efficacy of high-frequency ultrasound was similar to that of X-ray contrast enema, furthermore this study also demonstrates the benefits of using high-frequency ultrasound to identify colonic strictures after necrotizing enterocolitis.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →