StayCurrentMD · Development and evaluation of a low-cost part-task trainer for laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia in boys and the acquisition of basic laparoscopy skills
Article1 min read·Published Jul 2020Older

Development and evaluation of a low-cost part-task trainer for laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia in boys and the acquisition of basic laparoscopy skills

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Jul 2020 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This study validates a low-cost simulation model for teaching laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in boys, demonstrating high fidelity and educational value across 34 university programs. Both residents and expert surgeons rated the trainer favorably for realism, accessibility, and effectiveness in developing basic laparoscopy skills.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Purpose

To examine the fidelity of our model of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) in boys and evaluate its value in resident training programs and the learning of basic laparoscopy skills.

Methods

We created a simulation model with inexpensive, easy-to-obtain equipment. Study participants from 34 university hospital departments received a user manual and an evaluation questionnaire (11 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale). We considered that the evaluation was positive when the median overall score was 4 or over. We compared the results for residents (n=26) vs. expert surgeons (n=29) (t tests).

Results

The duration of the procedure was significantly longer among the residents (30.0±16.8 min) than among the expert surgeons (20.5±11.7 min; p=0.01). In both groups, the participants rated the model favorably with regard to the overall impression (median score: 4.0±1.0), realism (4.0±0.9), ease of access to the required equipment (5.0±0.6), the quality of the user manual (5.0±0.6), ease of assembly (5.0±0.8), ease of the procedure (5.0±0.8), value in resident training programs (4.0±0.9), and value in learning basic laparoscopy skills (5.0±0.8)). The evaluation was positive (4.0±0.9).

Conclusion

Our low-cost model was an effective teaching and training tool for LIHR and basic laparoscopy skills.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →