StayCurrentMD · Congenital esophageal stenosis related to tracheobronchial remnant: balloon dilatation versus resection and anastomosis - a systematic review
Article1 min read·Published Mar 2026

Congenital esophageal stenosis related to tracheobronchial remnant: balloon dilatation versus resection and anastomosis - a systematic review

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Mar 2026 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This systematic review compares two treatment approaches for congenital esophageal stenosis caused by tracheobronchial remnants in pediatric patients: minimally invasive balloon dilatation versus surgical resection with anastomosis. The analysis addresses ongoing clinical debate about optimal management of this rare congenital malformation.

  • CES related to TBR is an extremely rare congenital malformation typically presenting in infants and young children.
  • Two accepted treatment options exist: endoscopic balloon dilatation and surgical resection with anastomosis.
  • No clear consensus exists on which treatment approach is superior for TBR-related esophageal stenosis.
  • Systematic review addresses the ongoing controversy between conservative endoscopic and definitive surgical management.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) related to tracheobronchial remnant (TBR) is an extremely rare malformation, typically diagnosed in infants and young children. Endoscopic dilatation or resection and anastomosis are both accepted therapeutic options, but the superiority of one versus the other remains controversial.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →