Comparison of perioperative surgical outcomes following total robotic and total laparoscopic Roux-en Y hepaticojejunostomy for choledochal cyst in paediatric population: a preliminary report from a tertiary referral centre
link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on link.springer.com ↗Article · Feb 2023 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
This retrospective study of 90 pediatric patients compared robotic versus laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy for choledochal cyst excision. Robotic approach demonstrated faster anastomosis time and reduced blood loss but longer overall operative time, with comparable complication rates between techniques.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Abstract
Purpose
There is a paucity of data regarding the comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) for the treatment of paediatric choledochal cysts. Thus, our primary objective was a comparison of early complications namely post-operative bleeding, anastomotic leak, intestinal obstruction and the need for reoperation in both techniques. Our secondary objectives included a comparison of the mean time for surgery and HJ, conversion of procedure to open, intraoperative blood loss, late complications like cholangitis, stricture and post-operative outcomes like time to start oral feeds and length of post-operative stay.
Methods
A retrospective data analysis of all children who underwent laparoscopic and robotic choledochal cyst excision with Roux-en-Y HJ from 2008 to 2021 was performed.
Results
Ninety patients were classified into Group R (robotic HJ), n = 20 and Group L (laparoscopic HJ), n = 70. Post-operative complications were comparable amongst groups R and L (2 vs 6; p = 1 and 1 vs 2, p = 0.53, respectively). Intraoperative blood loss was significantly less in group R (54.8 ± 13.5 ml vs 64.1 ± 17.3 ml; p = 0.0280). The mean time to complete HJ was significantly less in group R (58 ± 12 min vs 71 ± 11 min; p < 0.001) while the mean time to complete surgery was significantly more in Group R (284 ± 14 min vs 195 ± 18 min; p < 0.001).
Conclusion
Our preliminary research report suggests overall comparable early complications in both groups.