StayCurrentMD · Comparison of non-invasive physiological assessment tools between simple and perforated appendicitis in children
Article1 min read·Published Jul 2021Older

Comparison of non-invasive physiological assessment tools between simple and perforated appendicitis in children

link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on link.springer.com ↗

Article · Jul 2021 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Prospective study of 94 children with appendicitis comparing CRI and SIPA for distinguishing simple versus perforated cases. CRI significantly outperformed SIPA in detecting physiologic differences, with lower values correlating with perforation, suggesting potential utility for early risk stratification and management decisions.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Purpose

The role of non-invasive measures of physiologic reserve, specifically the Compensatory reserve index (CRI) and the Shock index pediatric age-adjusted (SIPA), is unknown in the management of children with acute appendicitis. CRI is a first-in-class algorithm that uses pulse oximetry waveforms to continuously monitor central volume status loss. SIPA is a well-validated, but a discontinuous measure of shock that has been calibrated for children.

Methods

Children with suspected acute appendicitis (2–17 years old) were prospectively enrolled at a single center from 2014 to 2015 and monitored with a CipherOx CRI™ M1 pulse oximeter. CRI values range from 1 (normovolemia) to 0 (life-threatening hypovolemia). SIPA is calculated by dividing heart rate by systolic blood pressure and categorized as normal or abnormal, based on age-specific cutoffs. Univariate and multivariable regression models were developed with simple versus perforated appendicitis as the outcome.

Results

Almost half the patients (45/94, 48%) had perforated appendicitis. On univariate analysis, the median admission CRI value was significantly higher (0.60 versus 0.33, p < 0.001) and the ED SIPA values were significantly lower (0.90 versus 1.10, p = 0.002) in children with simple versus perforated appendicitis. In a multivariable model, only CRI significantly detected differences in the physiologic state between patients with simple and perforated appendicitis.

Conclusions

CRI is a non-invasive measure of physiologic reserve that may be used to accurately guide early management of children with acute simple versus perforated appendicitis.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →