StayCurrentMD · Combining Cribari matrix and Need For Trauma Intervention (NFTI) to accurately assess undertriage in pediatric trauma
Article1 min read·Published Sep 2020Older

Combining Cribari matrix and Need For Trauma Intervention (NFTI) to accurately assess undertriage in pediatric trauma

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Sep 2020 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Study comparing triage assessment methods in pediatric trauma found that combining Cribari Matrix with Need For Trauma Intervention (NFTI) reduced undertriage rates to 2.7% versus 8.2% with Cribari alone. Undertriaged children had significantly higher mortality, longer ICU stays, and increased costs, suggesting the combined approach better identifies high-risk patients needing immediate trauma team activation.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Background/Purpose

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Committee on Trauma targets undertriage (UT) rates of <5% to optimize the chances of survival. The Cribari Matrix (CM) has traditionally been employed to identify undertriage, but it likely overestimates actual undertriage. An innovative tool called "Need For Trauma Intervention" (NFTI), demonstrates a more accurate assessment of undertriage in adults. We hypothesized that using the combination of CM and NFTI would more accurately identify UT in pediatric trauma patients, compared to CM alone.

Methods

We reviewed undertriage rates using CM and NFTI criteria. Univariate analysis was used to compare the need for surgical management, transfusion requirements, ventilator days, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, and hospital costs between CM, NFTI, and the combination of CM and NFTI.

Results

Undertriage rates were 8.2% with CM and 4.6% with NFTI. When CM and NFTI were combined, the UT rate was 2.7%. Pediatric patients categorized as UT by the combination of CM and NFTI had significantly longer ICU Length of Stay (LOS) (p < 0.001), hospital LOS (p < 0.001), higher mortality rates (p = 0.004), and higher hospitalization costs (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The combination of CM and NFTI identified UT in children, more accurately than CM or NFTI alone. Injured children who are undertriaged had higher mortality, morbidity, and cost of care. The use of CM in combination with NFTI to evaluate undertriage rates led to the identification of risk factors that may modify the activation criteria for highest and modified level trauma team activations.

Level of Evidence

III

Study Type

Retrospective study without negative criteria (Therapeutic/Care Management).

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →