Closing the Gap in Care of Blunt Solid Organ Injury in Children
bit.ly shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on bit.ly ↗Article · Jun 2020 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
This NTDB study (2007-2016) of 55,036 pediatric blunt liver and spleen injuries shows that adult and dual trauma centers continue to have higher operative intervention rates compared to pediatric centers, despite guideline shifts toward physiology-based management. The findings highlight persistent care gaps in non-pediatric facilities.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Introduction: Cross-sectional data of pediatric blunt solid organ injury (SOI) demonstrates higher rates of non-operative management and shorter lengths of stay (LOS) in pediatric (PTC) vs adult (ATC) or dual (DTC) trauma centers. Recent iterations of guidelines (McVay 2008, St Peter 2011, ATOMAC 2015) have emphasized physiologic parameters rather than injury grade in clinical decision making, improving resource allocation and decreasing LOS. We sought to evaluate how these guidelines have influenced care.
Methods: The National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2016) was queried for isolated spleen and liver injuries in patients less than 19 years old. Linear regression, odds ratio, and chi-squared test were used to determine significance between operative intervention or LOS among different trauma center types and grade of injury.
Result: A total of 55,036 blunt spleen or liver injuries were identified. Although operative rates decreased in ATCs over time (p=0.037), patients treated at ATCs or DTCs continued to demonstrate higher odds ratios of operative intervention (OR 4.43 and 2.88, respectively) compared to PTCs. Mean LOS decreased by 1.52 (p