StayCurrentMD · Author response to “Gastroschisis may be good, bad, not so ugly and falsely beautiful”
Article1 min read·Published Apr 2019Older

Author response to “Gastroschisis may be good, bad, not so ugly and falsely beautiful”

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Apr 2019 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This author response addresses delayed bowel complications in gastroschisis patients who appear healthy at initial closure. The discussion centers on a case requiring three subsequent operations for necrosis, stenosis, and atony despite normal appearance at birth, highlighting the unpredictable nature of intestinal dysfunction in this population.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

We appreciate the letter from Eyer Jesus, et al. in response to our study of infants with closing gastroschisis. The authors note that bowel that appears well perfused and without atresia at birth may be plagued with prolonged dysfunction after closure. They describe a case in which a patient with gastroschisis had no signs of ischemia at fascial closure, but subsequently required three operations for obstructive symptoms that appeared to be because of, sequentially, necrosis, stenosis, and atony.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →