StayCurrentMD · Attempting to trace the origins of circumcision
Article1 min read·Published Nov 2018Older

Attempting to trace the origins of circumcision

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Nov 2018 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This commentary addresses the difficulty of tracing circumcision's prehistoric origins, noting that evidence is scarce and interpretations vary. The author argues that historical origins are irrelevant to modern clinical practice, which should rely on evidence-based justifications rather than historical precedent.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

The trouble with attempting to trace the origins of circumcision, as your correspondents have tried [1–3], is that it is lost in prehistory, evidence is scant and open to interpretation, and it may have had more than one point of origin and for more than one purpose. For this reason it is a topic I generally steer clear of, regarding it as irrelevant to modern justifications, which should be evidence-based to have any validity.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →