StayCurrentMD · Association of Operative Approach with Outcomes in Neonates with Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula
Article1 min read·Published Apr 2021Older

Association of Operative Approach with Outcomes in Neonates with Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Apr 2021 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Retrospective analysis of 855 neonates with EA/TEF from NSQIP database (2014-2018) comparing thoracoscopic versus open repair. Thoracoscopic approach was attempted in 15.6% of cases with 53% conversion rate, showing longer operative times but similar perioperative outcomes to open repair.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Purpose: We sought to evaluate the impact of thoracoscopic repair on perioperative outcomes in infants with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF).

Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program pediatric database from 2014 to 2018 was queried for all neonates who underwent operative repair of EA/TEF. Operative approach based on intention to treat was correlated with perioperative outcomes, including 30-day postoperative adverse events, in logistic regression models.

Results: Among 855 neonates, initial thoracoscopic repair was performed in 133 (15.6%) cases. Seventy (53%) of these cases were converted to open. Those who underwent thoracoscopic repair were more likely to be full-term (p=0.03) when compared to those in the open repair group. There were no significant differences in perioperative outcome measures based on surgical approach except for operative time (thoracoscopic: 217 min vs. open: 180 min, p

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →