StayCurrentMD · An assessment of provider satisfaction with the use of a standardized visual aid for informed consent for appendectomy in children
Article1 min read·Published Mar 2020Older

An assessment of provider satisfaction with the use of a standardized visual aid for informed consent for appendectomy in children

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Mar 2020 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Study evaluating provider satisfaction with a standardized visual aid for appendectomy consent found that 52% of clinicians felt it significantly improved family understanding without adding substantial time to the consent process. Most providers reported the tool made consenting easier for both families and staff, though availability awareness remained a barrier to consistent use.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Purpose

We previously validated a visual aid for the use in the consent process for an appendectomy showing improved parental satisfaction and understanding. In this study, we evaluated provider satisfaction and perceived value of using the visual aid.

Methods

An IRB approved survey was developed assessing provider experience with use of the visual aid. This was distributed and analyzed via Research Electronic Data Capture (RedCap) Database.

Results

We administered 58 surveys (45% response rate). Participants included faculty (n = 2), fellows (n = 1), residents (n = 6), and physician assistants (n = 17). The visual aid was used >10 times by 50% of providers. The most common reason for not using the visual aid was not remembering it was available. Nearly half (40%) did not feel the visual aid added any time. 9/20 (45%) felt it added a small amount of time. Slightly over half of providers (52%) felt using the visual aid significantly increased family ability to give informed consent and made the consenting process easier for both providers and families.

Conclusion

Using a visual aid in consenting families for appendectomy does not add significant time and subjectively improves the process for providers and increases provider perception of parental understanding.

Level of Evidence

Cost effectiveness, Level IV.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →