StayCurrentMD · A survey of management preferences for bladder exstrophy and cloacal anomalies among Canadian pediatric surgeons and urologists
Article1 min read·Published Jan 2022Older

A survey of management preferences for bladder exstrophy and cloacal anomalies among Canadian pediatric surgeons and urologists

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Jan 2022 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Survey of 82 Canadian pediatric surgeons and urologists reveals that while most recognize surgical volume impacts outcomes for bladder exstrophy and cloacal anomalies, 58% do not refer patients elsewhere. Most respondents favor a consortium-based approach with regional centers of excellence over national centralization.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Purpose

This study examined the current referral patterns and preferences of Canadian Association of Paediatric Surgeons (CAPS) and Pediatric Urologists of Canada (PUC) members for management of bladder exstrophy and cloacal anomalies (BECA).

Methods

We invited CAPS and PUC members to participate in an online survey using RedCap. Demographic variables, years in practice, current referral patterns and local expertise at the participants' institution were collected. Participants' preferences towards three distinct referral models were assessed using Likert scales: no centralization of care, centralization in one or two national centres of excellence, or a consortium-based approach.

Results

There were 82 survey respondents (2/3 were CAPS members, 35.4% female, 72% in practice for >10 years). Although >90% of participants agreed/somewhat agreed that surgical volumes impact outcomes, 58% reported not referring out BECA patients for treatment; about 50% recognized the existence of a local dedicated expert. In terms of referral preferences, 84% of participants favoured identification of a few centres with expertise based on geographic location (a consortium-based approach), while only 7% chose a one or two national centres of excellence model. Over half of participants agreed/somewhat agreed with participating in trials of a consortium-based approach in Canada.

Conclusion

Most CAPS and PUC members do not refer BECA patients elsewhere for treatment. Nonetheless, most surgeons recognize the importance of volume to improve outcomes and show willingness to participate in trials to concentrate experience; most participants favour a consortium-based approach through identification of a few centres of excellence based on geographic location.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →