StayCurrentMD · A single institution’s experience with the management of peripheral bronchial atresia
Article1 min read·Published Mar 2022Older

A single institution’s experience with the management of peripheral bronchial atresia

link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on link.springer.com ↗

Article · Mar 2022 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

Retrospective review of 28 patients with peripheral bronchial atresia shows expectant management is safe for most cases, with only 2/22 patients requiring surgery for recurrent infections. Symptom changes may indicate alternate pathology like congenital lobar overinflation, warranting surgical evaluation.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Purpose

Peripheral bronchial atresia is a pulmonary abnormality diagnosed on postnatal computed tomography after prenatal imaging reveals a congenital lung lesion. Debate regarding management of this abnormality prompted us to review our institution’s practice patterns and outcomes.

Methods

All patients diagnosed with bronchial atresia were assessed from 6/2014 to 7/2020. Pediatric radiologists were surveyed to delineate computed tomography criteria used to diagnose peripheral bronchial atresia. Criteria were applied in an independent blinded review of postnatal imaging. Data for patients determined to have peripheral bronchial atresia and at least an initial pediatric surgical evaluation were analyzed.

Results

Twenty-eight patients with bronchial atresia received at least an initial pediatric surgical evaluation. Expectant management was planned for 22/28 (79%) patients. Two patients transitioned from an expectant management strategy to an operative strategy for recurrent respiratory infections; final pathology revealed bronchial atresia in both. Six patients were initially managed operatively; final pathology revealed bronchial atresia (n = 3) or congenital lobar overinflation (n = 3).

Conclusions

Peripheral bronchial atresia can be safely managed expectantly. A change in symptoms is suspicious for alternate lung pathology, warranting further workup and consideration for resection.

Level of evidence

Level IV.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →