Dr. Daniel Ostlie · A simple and more cost-effective antibiotic regimen for perforated appendicitis
Follow
Article1 min read·Published Jan 2006Older

A simple and more cost-effective antibiotic regimen for perforated appendicitis

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗

Article · Jan 2006 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This retrospective study compared a simplified 2-drug antibiotic regimen (ceftriaxone and metronidazole) to the traditional 3-drug regimen (ampicillin, gentamicin, clindamycin) in 250 pediatric patients with perforated appendicitis. The once-daily 2-drug protocol demonstrated superior temperature control, similar clinical outcomes, and reduced medication costs while simplifying postoperative management.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Daniel Ostlie

Objective: Appendicitis is the most common abdominal emergency in children. When perforation is encountered, postoperative management is grounded upon the use of intravenous antibiotics. The 3-drug regimen of ampicillin, gentamicin, and clindamycin has long been the accepted standard by pediatric surgeons. Although effective and seemingly inexpensive, this regimen produces a cumbersome dosing schedule, which has inspired the search for a simpler regimen that does not compromise efficacy or expense. To this end, we have introduced a 2-drug regimen of ceftriaxone and Flagyl (Pharmacia Corporation, Chicago, Ill) with once-a-day dosing. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of the most recent 250 patients treated at our institution with perforated appendicitis. Patients treated since the implementation of this 2-drug regimen were compared with the recent historical cohort treated with triple antibiotic coverage. Parameters analyzed between the 2 groups included temperature curves for the first 5 postoperative days, abscess rate, length of hospitalization, length of intravenous antibiotic treatment, and medication charges. Results: The 2-drug regimen was used in 57 patients (group 1) compared with 193 patients treated with triple antibiotic coverage (group 2). Maximum recorded temperature between the 2 groups was similar upon admission, but the mean maximum temperature in group 1 became significantly lower than group 2 from postoperative day 1 onward (P < .001). Postoperat

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →