A comparison of robotic-assisted splenectomy and laparoscopic splenectomy for children with hematologic disorders
jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗Article · Sep 2020 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
Retrospective comparison of 24 pediatric patients undergoing robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic splenectomy for hematologic disorders found that robotic approach handled larger spleens and achieved shorter hospital stays (2.1 vs 3.2 days) but with higher costs ($44,724 vs $30,255), suggesting robotic splenectomy is safe and feasible though economic considerations remain.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Abstract
Introduction
Laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) is the standard of care for hematologic disorders requiring splenectomy. Less is known about the outcomes following robotic-assisted splenectomy (RS) for this indication. Our aim was to describe outcomes of RS to LS in pediatric patients with hematologic disorders in our institution.
Methods
A single institution retrospective review was performed of pediatric patients undergoing LS vs. RS from 2014 to 2019. Patient demographics, diagnosis, spleen size, hospital length of stay (LOS), operative time, post-operative opioid use, and hospital charges were evaluated. Standard univariate analyses were performed.
Results
Twenty-four patients were included in the study (14 LS, 10 RS). The mean spleen size at the time of surgery was larger in the RS group compared to LS (14.5 cm vs. 12.2 cm, p = 0.03). Operative time between the two cohorts was comparable (RS 140.5 vs LS 154.9 min). Median LOS for RS was shorter than LS (2.1 vs. 3.2 days, p = 0.02). Cumulative postoperative opioid analgesic requirements were not significantly different between the groups (17.4 mg vs. 30.5 mg). The median hospital charges, including the surgical procedure and hospital stay were higher in the RS group ($44,724 RS vs $30,255 LS, p = 0.01).
Conclusion
Robotic splenectomy is a safe and feasible option for pediatric patients with hematologic disorders, and was associated with decreased LOS but higher charges compared to laparoscopic splenectomy. Further studies are required to delineate the optimal use and potential benefits of robot-assisted surgical techniques in children.
Level of Evidence
II.
