A cloacal anomaly is not a disorder of sex development
link.springer.com shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on link.springer.com ↗Article · Sep 2019 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
Retrospective study of 605 cloacal patients found 12.7% were misdiagnosed as disorders of sex development, leading to unnecessary interventions including karyotyping and hormonal treatment. Careful perineal examination distinguishing true clitoral hypertrophy from prominent labial skin prevents misdiagnosis and inappropriate management.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Abstract
Aim of the study
Misdiagnosing a cloaca as a disorder of sex development may lead to inappropriate testing, treatment, and negative emotional consequences to families. We were impressed by the fact that a significant number of patients suffering from a cloaca were referred to us with the diagnosis of a “disorder of sex development” previously referred as “ambiguous genitalia” or “intersex”. On re-evaluation, none of them truly had a disorder of sex differentiation. This prompted us to conduct the following retrospective review to try to find the cause of the misdiagnosis and the way to prevent it.
Methods
A retrospective review of our colorectal database was performed to identify the total number of patients with cloacas and the number initially diagnosed as “ambiguous genitalia, intersex”/disorder of sex development. The external appearance of their genitalia and unnecessary testing or treatment received were recorded.
Main results
A total of 605 patients with cloacas were identified. Of these, 77 (12.7%) were referred to us with the diagnosis of “ambiguous genitalia” and 13 of them (17%) went on to receive an intervention that was not indicated: karyotyping (10), steroids (3), and ovarian biopsy (1). The karyotype result in all patients was XX. The misdiagnosis was triggered by the external appearance of the perineum, simulating a case of virilization with a hypertrophic clitoris, but was simply prominent labial skin. Careful examination of the perineal structure allowed us to determine that it consisted of folded skin with no evidence of corpora.
Conclusion
Patients born with a cloaca are at risk for mismanagement from being erroneously labeled as disorders of sex development. The diagnosis of a cloacal anomaly is a clinical one. The practitioner must distinguish between phallus-like clitoral hypertrophy and a normal clitoris with prominent labial skin.