StayCurrentMD · A baseline assessment of enhanced recovery protocol implementation at pediatric surgery practices performing inflammatory bowel disease operations
Article1 min read·Published Jul 2020Older

A baseline assessment of enhanced recovery protocol implementation at pediatric surgery practices performing inflammatory bowel disease operations

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Jul 2020 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This multi-center survey assessed baseline enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) implementation across 18 pediatric surgery departments performing IBD operations, finding an average of only 6.3 out of 21 evidence-based elements in use. Surgeon-controlled interventions like minimally invasive techniques showed high adoption (100%), while system-level changes such as patient education and preoperative optimization had minimal implementation, highlighting barriers to comprehensive ERP adoption in pediatric IBD surgery.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Abstract

Background

Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) have been used to improve patient outcomes and resource utilization after surgery. These evidence-based interventions include patient education, standardized anesthesia protocols, and limited fasting, but their use among pediatric populations is lagging. We aimed to determine baseline recovery practices within pediatric surgery departments participating in an ERP implementation trial for elective inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) operations.

Methods

To measure baseline ERP adherence, we administered a survey to a staff surgeon in each of the 18 participating sites. The survey assessed demographics of each department and utilization of 21 recovery elements during patient encounter phases. Mixed-methods analysis was used to evaluate predictors and barriers to ERP element implementation.

Results

The assessment revealed an average of 6.3 ERP elements being practiced at each site. The most commonly practiced elements were using minimally invasive techniques (100%), avoiding intraabdominal drains (89%), and ileus prophylaxis (72%).

The preoperative phase had the most elements with no adherence including patient education, optimizing medical comorbidities, and avoiding prolonged fasting. There was no association with number of elements utilized and total number of surgeons in the department, annual IBD surgery volume, and hospital size. Lack of buy-in from colleagues, electronic medical record adaptation, and resources for data collection and analysis were identified barriers.

Conclusions

Higher intervention utilization for IBD surgery was associated with elements surgeons directly control such as use of laparoscopy and avoiding drains. Elements requiring system-level changes had lower use. The study characterizes the scope of ERP utilization and the need for effective tools to improve adoption.

Level of evidence

Level III.

Type of study

Mixed-methods survey.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →