Effect of physician specialty training on pediatric appendectomy outcomes: an NSQIP-P analysis

Abstract

Abstract

Purpose

Appendectomies are the most common abdominal emergency surgery in pediatric patients. Both pediatric and general surgeons are credentialed to perform this procedure, however pediatric surgeons are specialized in pediatrics. This study seeks to determine differences in pediatric appendectomy outcomes between general and pediatric surgeons.

Methods

Pediatric patients undergoing appendectomies between 2015 and 2020 were identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric (NSQIP-P) database. Multivariable logistic regression models examined association of surgeon specialty with readmission, postoperative complications, reoperation, non-home discharge destination, operative time, etc. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

Results

Average ages of pediatric patients undergoing appendectomy by pediatric and general surgeons were 11.2 (n = 68,638) and 12.3 (n = 3,986) years, respectively (p < .001). General surgeons were not more likely to have adverse outcomes [AOR: 1.00 (0.99–1.01), p = 0.57], readmissions [AOR: 0.995 (0.98–1.00), p = 0.11], reoperations [AOR: 1.00 (0.99–1.00), p = 0.54], or non-home discharges [AOR: 0.99 (0.99–1.00), p = 0.94].

Conclusions

Similar outcomes arise in pediatric appendectomies performed by general surgery at a children’s hospital or hospitals with a pediatric wing. Significant limitations to using the NSQIP-P database persist. Further research including hospitals contributing to both adult and pediatric databases can provide a clearer picture of post-surgical outcomes in appendectomies.

Keywords

Hashtags

This article is published on an external journal. Click below to read the full text.