Bibliographic Research with ChatGPT may be Misleading: Comment

Abstract

We would like to comment on the paper entitled “Bibliographic Research with ChatGPT may be misleading: The Problem of Hallucination [1].” The paper emphasizes the advantages of utilizing advanced algorithms and large training sets to reduce bias and errors in chatbots. Relying on a single data source can result in restrictions and potential issues, making it critical to employ cutting-edge solutions for more accurate and dependable chatbot responses. Chatbots can be trained to deliver more thorough and unbiased information by using broad and extensive training data.

Keywords

Hashtags

This article is published on an external journal. Click below to read the full text.