Synthetic versus Biological Patches for CDH: A Comparison of Recurrence Rates and Adverse Events, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis
Topic overview
Systematic review comparing synthetic versus biological patches for CDH repair in pediatric patients shows synthetic patches have lower recurrence rates (16.7% vs 30.3%) but higher skeletal deformity risk. PTFE demonstrated 11.5% recurrence compared to 33.3% for SIS-based biological patches, though newer biological materials may perform better than historical SIS data suggests.
Keywords
Hashtags
Full article text
Full article text not available for this entry
How to cite: GlobalCastMD. Synthetic versus Biological Patches for CDH: A Comparison of Recurrence Rates and Adverse Events, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis. GlobalCastMD Medical Library. 2022-11-02. https://library.globalcastmd.com/article/5945
Comments