1 Views
0 Likes
0 Shares
0 Comments
Read article ↗

StayCurrentMD

View profile →

Article

Synthetic versus Biological Patches for CDH: A Comparison of Recurrence Rates and Adverse Events, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis

Published: Reading: 1 min

Topic overview

Systematic review comparing synthetic versus biological patches for CDH repair in pediatric patients shows synthetic patches have lower recurrence rates (16.7% vs 30.3%) but higher skeletal deformity risk. PTFE demonstrated 11.5% recurrence compared to 33.3% for SIS-based biological patches, though newer biological materials may perform better than historical SIS data suggests.

Keywords

Hashtags

Full article text

Full article text not available for this entry
How to cite: GlobalCastMD. Synthetic versus Biological Patches for CDH: A Comparison of Recurrence Rates and Adverse Events, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis. GlobalCastMD Medical Library. 2022-11-02. https://library.globalcastmd.com/article/5945

Comments

Loading comments...