Central Line Placement at ECMO Decannulation: A Missed Opportunity

Abstract

Abstract

Introduction

ECMO is a support modality for refractory critical illness. This study reviews the incidence and utility of central venous line (CVL) placement at pediatric ECMO decannulation.

Methods

A single-institution retrospective study of patients undergoing open neck decannulation from 2015 to 2019. Patients were divided into two groups:  ≤ 28-days and > 28-days.

Results

Of 65 patients, 31% had a CVL placed at decannulation. Sepsis and pneumonia were the most common indications for ECMO in the older-group compared to CDH in neonates. The most common indications for CVL were hemodialysis (45%), monitoring (25%), and access (25%). 89% of neonates had an access line placed, whereas 73% of the older group received hemodialysis catheters. Median CRRT requirement was 20 days. 85% of lines were functional at time of removal or death. None were removed for infection. 40% of the patients not receiving a CVL at decannulation required one within 30 days.

Conclusion

69% of patients did not have a CVL placed at decannulation, however 40% required a CVL within 30 days. Most lines placed at decannulation remained functional and none were removed for infection. Decannulation removes the circuit as a route for vascular access, but it also presents an opportunity to safely place an essential CVL.

Keywords

Hashtags

This article is published on an external journal. Click below to read the full text.