Roshni Dasgupta · Developing the research roadmap together: a report from the patient-centered outcome research institute (PCORI) and pediatric surgical oncology research collaborative (PSORC)
Follow
Article1 min read·Published Mar 2026

Developing the research roadmap together: a report from the patient-centered outcome research institute (PCORI) and pediatric surgical oncology research collaborative (PSORC)

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗

Article · Mar 2026 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This article describes a collaborative effort between PCORI and PSORC to develop a patient-centered research agenda for pediatric solid tumor surgery. Using a five-component framework and equal representation from physicians and patient stakeholders, the initiative identified critical gaps in surgical outcomes research and prioritized topics through systematic review and value-of-information analysis.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Roshni Dasgupta

OBJECTIVE: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) and Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) focusing on pediatric cancer surgery are insufficient. To address this need, the authors aimed to create an evidence-based PCOR agenda for children with solid tumors. METHODS: Between September 2021 and October 2022, the Pediatric Surgical Oncology Research Collaborative (PSORC) advocacy group, composed of 25 physicians and 25 nonmedical patient/parent stakeholders, developed a research agenda culminating in an in-person meeting. Stakeholders included parents of children treated for solid tumors, survivors of childhood cancers, patient advocates, and pediatric oncology (medical and surgical) providers. A multisource five-component framework was used to develop the roadmap: (1) Education, (2) Topic Generation, (3) Gap Analysis and Systematic Review, (4) Value of Information (VOI) Analysis, and (5) Peer Review. Topic generation involved both physician and stakeholder meetings, focus groups, generating a word cloud, and a survey sent to 48 solid tumor disease and advocacy support groups representing over 1000 families. VOI analysis and peer review were conducted in person with 50 participants (25 stakeholders/25 physicians). Descriptive and thematic results are presented. RESULTS: A systematic review identified only a single surgical PCOR report addressing pediatric solid tumors. Gap analysis demonstrated that surgeons’ goals focused primarily on improving surgical outcomes, whereas

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →