Live Event Content · 2025 Pediatric Surgery Update Course - Updates in Pediatric Surgery feat. non-JPS Journals
Video22 min·Published Aug 2025

2025 Pediatric Surgery Update Course - Updates in Pediatric Surgery feat. non-JPS Journals

With Dr. Jose Campos & Dr. Johan Karameez & Dr. Katie Rossel · hosted by Dr. Todd Ponsky · Live Event Content
Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to appendicitis · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →

More about appendicitis

same diagnosisDive deeper → Appendicitis (17 items)

More from Dr. Campos

same expert · first-hand onlyDive deeper → Dr. Jose Campos

More from Live Event Content

same institutionDive deeper → Live Event Content
What the experts said9 expert statements · 17 host summaries
The Chilean Society of Pediatric Surgery Journal Hive team screens through 1200 articles each month using a method to select high-quality publications
ClinicalJose Campos
The failure rate over 30% in nonoperative management of appendicitis is concerning, but nonoperative management is still safe with no adverse events in both groups
Opinion
In pediatric trauma, the cutoff of approximately 12 years or puberty is used as the breaking point for when to think about VTE prophylaxis
GuidelineKatie Rossel
VTE prophylaxis should be started as soon as the patient is stable unless there are contraindications like TBI, and conversations with neurosurgeons can often clarify when it is safe to start
ClinicalKatie Rossel
Only one in every 1000 appendectomy patients will have a tumor in the appendix, and not all are neuroendocrine tumors, meaning every surgeon will only treat a handful of these cases in their lifetime
EpidemiologicalJose Campos
Multiple retrospective studies and the large database study have shown that appendectomy alone is sufficient for appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors, and additional imaging is not needed because it does not change management
Clinical
A review of 5000 children who had appendectomy at SickKids found about 30 had a carcinoid, only 10 underwent right hemicolectomy, and of these 10 maybe only half actually needed it
Clinical
The biology of appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors is totally different in children compared to adults, and the behavior in pediatric patients and adolescents is entirely different than in adults, with margins not making a difference when doing appendectomy alone
ClinicalJose Campos
Previous studies on appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors drew the line at 15 years, but the database study compared up to 18 years, so conclusions are valid up to 18 years of age
ClinicalJose Campos
The APPY trial is an international multicenter study comparing appendectomy versus antibiotics for acute uncomplicated appendicitis in children, with 936 patients aged 5-16 years randomized across 11 hospitals
Host summaryJose Campos · not cited in answers
In the APPY trial, treatment failure was defined differently in each arm: in the antibiotic group as appendectomy needed within one year, and in the surgical group as negative appendectomy or any procedure under general anesthesia related to appendicitis within one year
Host summaryJose Campos · not cited in answers
At one year in the APPY trial, 31% of children in the antibiotic group failed treatment compared with 7% in the appendectomy group, with the 26.7% difference exceeding the pre-specified 20% non-inferiority margin
Host summaryJose Campos · not cited in answers
Children in the antibiotic group of the APPY trial returned to school earlier and needed almost no pain medication
Host summaryJose Campos · not cited in answers
The APPY trial had 10% of patients with incomplete data and consent refusal reasons were not collected
Host summaryJose Campos · not cited in answers
Some guidelines recommend against DVT prophylaxis in pediatric trauma, and in the study only 50% of doctors caring for these children gave DVT prophylaxis
Host summaryJose Campos · not cited in answers
A JAMA Surgery 2024 study prospectively evaluated 462 pediatric trauma patients with high risk for deep vein thrombosis across level one trauma centers, comparing outcomes based on whether prophylaxis was given and when it was initiated
Host summaryJohan Karameez · not cited in answers
No major bleeding event occurred in any patient who received anticoagulation in the DVT prophylaxis study
Host summaryJohan Karameez · not cited in answers
Patients who received DVT prophylaxis within 24 hours had a venous thromboembolism rate of 1.6%, while those who received it after 24 hours had a rate of 6.9%, nearly identical to the 5.3% in patients who never received prophylaxis
Host summaryJohan Karameez · not cited in answers
The DVT prophylaxis study had low adherence to VTE guidelines with almost half of patients never receiving prophylaxis and relatively low absolute numbers of VTE events restricting statistical power
Host summaryJohan Karameez · not cited in answers
The DVT prophylaxis study was powered to detect any adverse event and there was no adverse event whatsoever from prophylaxis
Host summaryJose Campos · not cited in answers
A Journal of American College of Surgeons 2025 study using the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2022 identified 1339 patients under 18 years with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors, comparing appendectomy versus right hemicolectomy
Host summaryJose Campos · not cited in answers
In the neuroendocrine tumor study, survival was excellent and equivalent between appendectomy and hemicolectomy groups: 99.9% at 5 years and 99.4% at 10 years without chemotherapy or additional treatment
Host summaryJose Campos · not cited in answers
No forced disease progression occurred in children treated with appendectomy alone, even when high-risk features like tumor larger than 2 centimeters, positive margins, or positive lymph nodes were present
Host summaryJose Campos · not cited in answers
The TOUCH trial was the first multicenter randomized control trial comparing stoma versus anastomosis in necrotizing enterocolitis, randomizing patients during laparotomy when both options were deemed feasible
Host summaryJose Campos · not cited in answers
The TOUCH trial found no difference in mortality or complications in general between stoma and anastomosis groups, but the stoma group had up to 19% of intestinal and stoma complications
Host summaryJose Campos · not cited in answers
In the TOUCH trial, the likelihood of being weaned from parenteral nutrition was much higher in the anastomosis group, and children were weaned 20 days earlier compared to the stoma group
Host summaryJose Campos · not cited in answers