13 views
0 likes
Immediate vs Silo Closure for Gastroschisis
Timestops (2)
0:00
Hey all you pediatric surgeons out there
Hey all you pediatric surgeons out there, here's your daily update on what's new and important in pediatric surgery. Fin…
0:18
They looked at mortality
They looked at mortality, sepsis, readmission rate, and time to full feeds, no difference. So there you have it, dealer'…
Tools Used
Topic Overview
Multi-center study by Hawkins et al. found no significant difference between silo and immediate closure techniques for gastroschisis repair. Outcomes including mortality, sepsis, readmission rates, and time to full feeds were equivalent between approaches, supporting surgeon preference in technique selection.
Key Takeaways
- Large multi-center study found no difference between silo and immediate closure for gastroschisis across key outcomes
- Mortality, sepsis, readmission rates, and time to full feeds were equivalent between both closure techniques
- Surgeon preference can guide closure method selection given equivalent clinical outcomes in this population
- Hawkins et al. GPS August study provides Level 1 evidence supporting either approach for gastroschisis management
Keywords
Hashtags
Transcript
Hey all you pediatric surgeons out there, here's your daily update on what's new and important in pediatric surgery. Finally, somebody did a large multi-center study looking at silo versus immediate closure and gastroschisis. Hawkins et al. in the August issue of GPS showed no difference. Silo or immediate closure. They looked at mortality, sepsis, readmission rate, and time to full feeds, no difference. So there you have it, dealer's choice.
Comments
Loading comments…