From
Dr. Daniel Ostlie
The anatomic findings during operative exploration for non-palpable testes: A prospective evaluation
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗Article · Oct 2015 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
This prospective study of 80 patients with non-palpable testes found that 46% had atrophic or absent testes, while 54% had normal-appearing testes primarily located in the inguinal canal. Most patients did not require vascular division during orchiopexy, with atrophic testes more commonly left-sided and associated with closed internal rings.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Background: We conducted a randomized trial comparing 1 and 2-stage laparoscopic orchiopexy for intra-abdominal testes. During recruitment, it became apparent that most patients with non-palpable testes do not require vascular division. In this report, we outline the location and quality of testes found during operative exploration in patients who consented for the study but were not randomized. Methods: Analysis was performed on 80 patients undergoing operative exploration for non-palpable testes between 2007 and 2014. The location and pathology of undescended testes were analyzed. Results: There were 87 preoperative non-palpable testes in 80 patients that were consented but not randomized to 1 or 2 stage orchiopexy with vascular division. Forty (46%) of nonrandomized testes were atrophic or absent, and 47 (54%) were normal in appearance. Sixty eight testes were evaluated via laparoscopy. The most common location for normal (81%) and absent/atrophic (70%) testes was the inguinal canal. Atrophic testes were more often left sided (72.5%) with normal testes equally divided. Patients with atrophic or absent testicles were more likely to have a closed internal ring (p<0.01). Conclusion: This study demonstrates the majority of patients undergoing operative exploration for non-palpable testes will not require vascular division, and instead would be either atrophic or able to undergo traditional orchiopexy. Level Of Evidence: III.
Educational content from recorded physician discussions — not medical advice. Talk to your (or your child's) care team about your situation.
Article
Complications in common general pediatric surgery procedures
Daniel Ostlie · Published Oct 2026
Article
Timing of inguinal hernia repair does not influence recurrence in premature infants
Daniel Ostlie · Published Sep 2026
Article
Age-dependent outcomes in asymptomatic umbilical hernia repair
Daniel Ostlie · Published Nov 2018
Article
15-Year experience in the treatment of rectal prolapse in children
Daniel Ostlie · Published Jan 2010
Article
Contemporary practice patterns in the surgical management of Hirschsprung's disease
Daniel Ostlie · Published Jan 2009
Article
Predictors of emesis and time to goal intake after pyloromyotomy: analysis from a prospective trial
Daniel Ostlie · Published Jan 2008
Article
A review of vascular surgery in the pediatric population.
Daniel Ostlie · Published Oct 2026
Article
Contemporary National Trend in Surgical Management of Hemodynamically Unstable Pediatric Blunt Splenic Injury
Daniel Ostlie · Published Oct 2026
Article
The use of stab incisions for instrument access in laparoscopic urological procedures
Daniel Ostlie · Published Oct 2026
Article
Epidural versus PCA Pain Management after Pectus Excavatum Repair: A Multi-Institutional Prospective Randomized Trial.
Daniel Ostlie · Published Oct 2026
Article
Transanastomotic Tube Use and Anastomotic Stricture: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial in Neonates Undergoing Repair of Type C Esophageal Atresia With Distal Tracheoesophageal Fistula.
Daniel Ostlie · Published Oct 2026
Article
Open vs laparoscopic repair of congenital duodenal obstructions: a concurrent series
Daniel Ostlie · Published Oct 2026
