Ramy Shaaban · Examining audiology students’ clinical reasoning skills with virtual audiology cases aided with no collaboration, live collaboration, and virtual collaboration
Follow
Article1 min read·Published Jul 2020Older

Examining audiology students’ clinical reasoning skills with virtual audiology cases aided with no collaboration, live collaboration, and virtual collaboration

medrxiv.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on medrxiv.org ↗

Article · Jul 2020 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This quasi-experimental study compared audiology students' clinical reasoning across three learning conditions: independent work, face-to-face collaboration, and virtual collaboration using simulation software. Results showed significant differences between groups, with both collaborative approaches enhancing clinical reasoning skills compared to working alone.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Ramy Shaaban

Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the difference in clinical reasoning skills of students when using virtual audiology cases aided with no collaboration, virtual collaboration, and live collaboration. The theoretical framework discussed five major approaches that could explain this effect; Situated Learning Theory, Social Development Theory, Scaffolding, Collaborative Learning, and Cognitive Load Theory. A quasi-experimental design was conducted at two U.S. universities to examine whether there is a significant difference in clinical reasoning skills between the three treatment groups using IUP Audiosim software. The clinical reasoning data were analyzed using One-Way ANOVA, and Tukey HSD for ANOVA. The results indicated that there was a significant difference in clinical reasoning skills between the three treatment groups. Further analyses are shown in the body of the study.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →