Alessandro de Alarcon · Vocal Fold Injection Augmentation for Post-Airway Reconstruction Dysphonia: A Case Series
Follow
Article1 min read·Published May 2022Older

Vocal Fold Injection Augmentation for Post-Airway Reconstruction Dysphonia: A Case Series

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗

Article · May 2022 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This retrospective study evaluates vocal fold injection augmentation as a treatment for post-airway reconstruction dysphonia in 34 pediatric patients. Results showed 85% reported subjective voice improvement with significant functional quality-of-life gains and no complications, supporting VFIA as a safe intervention for this complex patient population.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Alessandro de Alarcon

Objectives: Post airway reconstruction dysphonia (PARD) is common and has a significant effect on the quality of life of patients. Vocal fold injection augmentation (VFIA) is one treatment that can be used to improve glottic insufficiency in some patients. The goal of this study was to characterize the use and outcomes of VFIA for PARD. Methods: Retrospective chart review from January 2007 to July 2018 at a tertiary pediatric care center. Consecutive patients with PARD who underwent VFIA, who had a preoperative voice evaluation and a follow-up evaluation within 3 months after VFIA (fat, carboxymethylcellulose gel, hyaluronic acid). Results: Thirty-four patients (20 female) underwent VFIA. The mean age at the time of the injection was 13.6 years (SD 6.1). Twenty patients (58.8%) had a history of prematurity and a mean of 1.8 open airway surgeries. After injection, 29/34 patients (85.3%) noted a subjective voice improvement. The baseline Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) overall severity score decreased by a mean of 5.7 (SD = 19.6) points, P = .12. Total pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI) improved by 6.0 (SD = 19.5) points, from 57.4 (SD = 20.0) to 51.4 (SD = 17.2), P = .09. Functional pVHI subscore demonstrated a significant improvement, with a decrease of 3.4 (SD = 7.3) points, P = .02. All procedures were performed as an overnight observation and no complication occurred. Conclusion: Patients with PARD represent a complex subset of patients. VFIA

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →