StayCurrentMD · Rothenberg Vail
Follow
Document2 min read·Published May 2026

Rothenberg Vail

Document · May 2026 · 2 min read

In brief

In brief

Thoracoscopic vertebral body tethering applies guided growth principles to correct scoliosis in skeletally immature patients (Risser 0, curves 40-65°), offering an alternative to posterior spinal fusion. The technique uses lateral tethering to modulate vertebral growth while preserving disc hydration and spinal motion, though early outcomes show 41% revision rates primarily due to tether breakage and overcorrection.

  • Vertebral body tethering applies guided growth principles (Heuter-Volkman Law) to correct scoliosis in skeletally immature patients (Risser 0, Sanders ≤4).
  • Ideal candidates have 40-65° flexible curves with adequate remaining growth; curves too large risk tether breakage, too small may overcorrect.
  • Thoracoscopic technique requires posteriorly placed portals to accommodate spinal rotation; single-lung ventilation and ketamine anesthesia are standard.
  • Early outcomes show good coronal/sagittal correction but 41% revision rate for tether breakage or overcorrection; disc hydration and vertebral remodeling maintained.
  • Critical technical points: spare segmental arteries when instrumenting both sides, verify screw placement with O-arm, tension tether appropriately to avoid overcorrection.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the document.

Dr. Steve Rothenberg

Surgical content by Dr. Steve Rothenberg — Lectures & Presentations
Full text

THORACOSCOPIC SPINE TETHERING IN SCOLIOSISDr Jaren Riley, MDDr Steve Rothenberg, MD

OBJECTIVES•Understand principle of guided growth for osseus structures•History of guided growth for the spine•Indications for vertebral body tethering•T echnique•Outcomes

POSTERIOR SPINAL FUSION•3 hurdles with posterior spinal fusion•Must wait for skeletal maturity (or near maturity)•Decreased spinal motion•Adjacent segment degeneration

GUIDED GROWTH •Heuter-Volkman Law•Compression across a growth plate slow growth•Distraction accelerates growth

GUIDED GROWTH IN THE SPINE •Newton et al 2008•Bovine model•Placed lateral tether•6 months of growth•Straight spines became curved•Vertebral stapling•Rigid implant across mobile segment•Poor outcomes

FURTHER INNOVATION •Lenke 2010•Vertebral tether with polypropylene rope across mobile segment•Newton•Also showed that discs maintained hydration•Vertebral bodies returned to normal shape•This is the key to MAINTAINING the correction!!!

INDICATIONS •Growth•Must have enough growth remaining to correct the curve•Shouldn’t have too much growth remaining, or curve will overcorrect•Curve size•Curve should be large enough that it will predictably need surgical intervention in the future•Curves too big will not correct•T ether will break•Mechanics too powerful for tether to overpower •Growth•Risser 0, triradiate cartilage closed, Sanders hand stage ≤ 4•Curve Size•40-65º

INDICATIONS•Must be able to tolerate single lung ventilation•Screen for risk factors pre op•ALWAYS tell parents, we don’t know until we know•Any risk factors•Pre op nebulizer treatment•All patients•Ketamine•No longer use double lumen ET tube •Flexible curve•Rotation•Doesn’t remodel well•Rotation must either be small, or family must understand it may not improve•T4 may be upper limit for instrumentation•L4 may be lower limit (iliac crest gets in the way)

TECHNIQUE •Lateral decubitus•Convexity up•Arrange padding to allow for curve manipulation

TECHNIQUE •Thoracoscpic access•3-4 incisions•MUST create portals more posterior than normal to accommodate the rotation of the spine•Elevate periosteum, take down segmentals•If instrumenting both sides of a vertebral body, spare a segmental artery on one side

TECHNIQUE•Why posteriorly placed portals?

TECHNIQUE •How many portals?•2-3 levels/ portal•No need to create a new incision for each rib space•Shift current incision to next rib space

TECHNIQUE •Starter awl•Staple

TECHNIQUE •Tap•Screw

TECHNIQUE •Place and tension tether

TECHNIQUE •Check screw location, orientation, and length with O-arm

OUTCOMES•Samdani (n=11)•2 returned to OR to loosen tether (overcorrection)•Good curve correction in coronal, sagittal and axial planes •Newton (n=17)•41% revision rate•Complications•T ether breakage•Overcorrection•Curve progression

OUTCOMES •Number of cases: 8•Avg inpatient stay: 3.5 days•Avg time with chest tube: 2 days•No neurologic deficits•No infections•One gymnastics state champion (6 months postop)•Follow up too short

FUTURE DIRECTIONS •Refine indications•Algorithms for curve magnitude, growth remaining, flexibility, and how much correction to shoot for in surgery•Better instrumentation•Reliable tether•Smaller implants

Open in a new tab ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this document · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →