Colorectal Quiz: Episode 2
With Dr. Mark Levitt & Dr. Jason Frischer · hosted by Dr. Rod Gerardo & Dr. Todd Ponsky · Marc Levitt
Educational content from recorded physician discussions — not medical advice. Talk to your (or your child's) care team about your situation.
Podcast
Colorectal Quiz: Episode 2
Marc Levitt · 18 min · Published Jan 2021
Podcast
Colorectal Quiz Episode 2: When to redo a PSARP
18 min · Published Jan 2021
Podcast
Anorectal Malformations Complications
Marc Levitt · 48 min · Published Feb 2016
Podcast
Complications of Anorectal Malformations with Dr. Marc Levitt
48 min · Published Jan 2017
Podcast
Complications of Anorectal Malformations with Dr. Marc Levitt
48 min · Published Jan 2017
Video
Rectal Prolapse Repair Following a Posterior Sagittal Anorectoplasty
4 min · Published Jan 2025
Podcast
(500) Days of Summer (classic Movie Review: Zooey Deschanel, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Marc Webb) by The Cory Baker Show
Marc Levitt · Published Aug 2026
Video
Meeting with Marc Levitt: Clinical Discussion with Ivon Martinez
Marc Levitt · Published Jul 2026
Video
Introducing Dr. Marc Levitt: Pediatric Colorectal Surgeon Profile
Marc Levitt · Published Jul 2026
Video
Integrated Care Concept in Pediatric Colorectal Surgery by Marc Levitt
Marc Levitt · Published Jul 2026
Video
Patient Outreach and Communication in Pediatric Colorectal Surgery
Marc Levitt · Published Jul 2026
Video
Keynote Address on Pediatric Colorectal Surgery by Dr. Marc Levitt
Marc Levitt · Published Jul 2026
Podcast
Colorectal Quiz: Episode 49 - Collaborating for Kids: Colorectal & Pelvic Solutions (with a Little Help from AI)
Marc Levitt · 40 min · Published Jul 2025
Podcast
Colorectal Quiz: Episode 49 – Collaborating for Kids: Colorectal & Pelvic Solutions (with a Little Help from AI)
40 min · Published Jul 2025
Podcast
Colorectal Quiz: Episode 46
Marc Levitt · 29 min · Published Apr 2025
Podcast
Colorectal Quiz: Episode 46
Marc Levitt · 29 min · Published Apr 2025
Podcast
Colorectal Quiz: Episode 43
Marc Levitt · 23 min · Published Jan 2025
Podcast
Colorectal Quiz: Episode 43
Marc Levitt · 23 min · Published Jan 2025
Video
Dr. Marc Levitt on the CTO Mission in Pediatric Colorectal Surgery
Marc Levitt · Published Jul 2026
Video
Addressing Ministers of Health: Pediatric Colorectal Surgery Advocacy and Global Healthcare Priorities
Marc Levitt · Published Jul 2026
Video
Andrea Kesar Discusses Marc Levitt's Contributions to Pediatric Colorectal Surgery
Marc Levitt · Published Jul 2026
Video
Introduction to Dr. Marc Levitt's Pediatric Colorectal Surgery Practice
Marc Levitt · Published Jul 2026
Video
The History of International Colorectal Surgery Team Development
Marc Levitt · Published Jul 2026
Podcast
Hirschsprung's Disease with Dr. Marc Levitt
Marc Levitt · 22 min · Published Jul 2026
What the experts said
Many patients are seen on laxatives with an anus in the wrong place, and many patients have had cecostomy with perfect anatomy.
Families care whether the anoplasty will work and whether the child will be clean and in normal underwear, not how technically elegant the surgery is.
A sacral ratio of 0.7 or greater usually means normal or close to normal sphincters and good muscle tone, indicating that spine innervation of that area is probably good.
Higher anorectal malformations have worse prognosis for continence.
Patients with myelomeningocele have much more trouble with continence than those with tethered cord.
Visual inspection looks for the anal dimple and a midline raised area where the sphincters are and where the anoplasty ought to be.
It is amazingly common to have a mislocated anus because surgeons either miss where the center is during laparoscopic pull-through or open the PSARP incision first before marking sphincters.
A key pitfall is opening the PSARP incision first; instead, mark the sphincters first, then open the PSARP, to avoid confusion when placing the anoplasty.
The electrical stimulator used for sphincter mapping is the same one anesthesia uses for train of four, with an inexpensive connection with little pins.
Anesthesiologists should not give skeletal muscle relaxant when using the electrical stimulator because it is weaker than the traditional expensive stimulator.
In higher malformations such as bladder neck fistula in boys, the sphincter complex is sometimes more anterior than anticipated.
If the anatomy is known to be off, the redo should be done, and there is an advantage to getting the anatomy right when the child is younger.
For a two-year-old with mislocated anus or bad prolapse, offer a redo and let them live in diapers for a year or two with better anatomy, then see if they can successfully potty train.
Many patients present after potty training age because they are incontinent, and evaluation reveals the reason is they did not have the best operation.
When doing a redo for incontinence in an older child, usually add a Malone at the same time so they can learn to get control with their new anatomy before attempting voluntary bowel movements.
The process of learning control with new anatomy after redo may take six to twelve months.
For a patient with an anoplasty 50% within the sphincter complex at three and a half years old who is incontinent, one approach is to redo them, do a Malone, get them perfectly clean mechanically, then see if they can develop bowel control.
An alternative approach for borderline anatomy is to be more conservative and let the child take their car out for a ride first to see how it works before considering redo.
If patients have not declared their continence yet because they are not old enough behaviorally, give them a chance as they may succeed.
After anorectal malformation repair, the first operation might be the only shot to give the patient a good outcome and proper anatomy.
In the Journal of Pediatric Surgery study on reoperations for fecal incontinence after anorectal malformation repair, the vast majority of redos were for mislocation, followed by stricture.
Less common reasons for redo included remnant of original fistula (roof), rectal prolapse, and others.
Quality of life improved with a redo operation.
Patients had improved ability to achieve continence after redo operations.
In the study, 20% of patients with a poor sacrum or poor spine developed bowel control after their redo.
Patients with good potential (good sacrum and good spine) did extremely well after redo.
Patients who did not develop voluntary bowel movements after redo were still able to be clean with a bowel management program using enemas or antegrade via Malone.
The average age of patients in the redo study was about three and a half years.