Francesco T. Mangano · The Preventable Shunt Revision Rate: A Multicenter Evaluation
Follow
Article1 min read·Published Jan 2019Older

The Preventable Shunt Revision Rate: A Multicenter Evaluation

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗

Article · Jan 2019 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This multicenter study introduces the Preventable Shunt Revision Rate as a quality metric, analyzing 5,092 shunt operations across nine North American centers. Results show 35.7% of 90-day shunt failures were potentially preventable, with infection and catheter malposition as leading causes. Lack of endoscopy and recent infection history were independent predictors of preventable failure.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Francesco T. Mangano

Background: The Preventable Shunt Revision Rate (PSRR) was recently introduced as a novel quality metric. Objective: To evaluate the PSRR across multiple centers and determine associated variables. Methods: Nine participating centers in North America provided at least 2 years of consecutive shunt operations. Index surgery was defined as new shunt implantation, or revision of an existing shunt. For any index surgery that resulted in a reoperation within 90-days, index surgery information (demographic, clinical, and procedural) was collected and a decision made whether the failure was potentially preventable. The 90-day shunt failure rate and PSRR were calculated per institution and combined. Bivariate analyses were performed to evaluate individual effects of each independent variable on preventable shunt failure followed by a final multivariable model using a backward model selection approach. Results: A total of 5092 shunt operations were performed; 861 failed within 90 days of index operation, resulting in a 16.9% combined 90-day shunt failure rate and 17.6% median failure rate (range, 8.7%-26.9%). Of the failures, 307 were potentially preventable (overall and median 90-day PSRR, 35.7% and 33.9%, respectively; range, 16.1%-55.4%). The most common etiologies of avoidable failure were infection (n = 134, 44%) and proximal catheter malposition (n = 83, 27%). Independent predictors of preventable failure (P < .05) were lack of endoscopy (odds ratio [OR] = 2.26), recent shunt inf

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →