StayCurrentMD · Primary Liver Transplant in Biliary Atresia: The Case for and Against
Article1 min read·Published Mar 2024Older

Primary Liver Transplant in Biliary Atresia: The Case for and Against

jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗

Article · Mar 2024 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This review examines the longstanding debate over primary liver transplantation versus Kasai portoenterostomy as initial treatment for biliary atresia. Arguments center on whether KPE provides meaningful palliation or should be bypassed in favor of transplant, particularly in late-presenting cases with established cirrhosis.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

The role of liver transplantation as a primary procedure in biliary atresia has been argued over for at least 40 years, indeed since the coming of age of safe liver transplantation during the 1980s. Yet, it is not a common option in most series (usually ≤5%) and typically reserved for those with late presentations (arguably >100 days) with established cirrhosis.This review presents the pros and cons of primary liver transplant. The pros are based upon the observation that at best a Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE) is simply palliative in most, and at worse has no effect whatsoever on restoration of bile flow and is therefore pointless.

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →