Francesco T. Mangano · Presurgical language localization with visual naming associated ECoG high- gamma modulation in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy
Follow
Article1 min read·Published Feb 2017Older

Presurgical language localization with visual naming associated ECoG high- gamma modulation in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov shows its articles on its own site.

Read the article on pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ↗

Article · Feb 2017 · 1 min read

In brief

In brief

This study validates high-gamma modulation during picture-naming tasks as a non-invasive alternative to electrical cortical stimulation for presurgical language localization in children with drug-resistant epilepsy. Results show high specificity (0.81) and accuracy (0.71) for identifying language cortex in left hemisphere cases, with similar performance in both overt and covert naming paradigms.

Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.

Francesco T. Mangano

Objective: This prospective study compared presurgical language localization with visual naming-associated high-γ modulation (HGM) and conventional electrical cortical stimulation (ECS) in children with intracranial electrodes. Methods: Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who were undergoing intracranial monitoring were included if able to name pictures. Electrocorticography (ECoG) signals were recorded during picture naming (overt and covert) and quiet baseline. For each electrode the likelihood of high-γ (70-116 Hz) power modulation during naming task relative to the baseline was estimated. Electrodes with significant HGM were plotted on a three-dimensional (3D) cortical surface model. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated compared to clinical ECS. Results: Seventeen patients with mean age of 11.3 years (range 4-19) were included. In patients with left hemisphere electrodes (n = 10), HGM during overt naming showed high specificity (0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-0.85), and accuracy (0.71, 95% CI 0.66-0.75, p < 0.001), but modest sensitivity (0.47) when ECS interference with naming (aphasia or paraphasic errors) and/or oral motor function was regarded as the gold standard. Similar results were reproduced by comparing covert naming-associated HGM with ECS naming sites. With right hemisphere electrodes (n = 7), no ECS-naming deficits were seen without interference with oral-motor function. HGM mapping showed a high specificity (0.81, 95% CI 0.78-0.8

Read it at the source ↗

Try
Intelligent Search· scoped to this article · not medical adviceSearch the whole library →