Prenatally versus postnatally diagnosed congenital diaphragmatic hernia – Side, stage, and outcome
jpedsurg.org shows its articles on its own site.
Read the article on jpedsurg.org ↗Article · May 2018 · 1 min read
In brief
In brief
Multicenter study of 3,746 CDH cases (2007-2015) shows postnatally diagnosed cases have better survival (83% vs 65%) due to detection bias favoring smaller defects. When stratified by defect size, survival and ECMO rates are comparable between groups, with right-sided defects more frequently missed prenatally.
Written by the GCMD Library team from the article.
Aim
To compare outcomes between prenatally and postnatally diagnosed CDH in a large multicenter database of prospectively collected data and evaluate factors associated with poorer outcome for prenatally diagnosed CDH.
Material and Methods
We used information from the multicenter, multinational CDH Study Group database on patients born between 2007 and 2015. We compared differences between prenatally and postnatally diagnosed CDH with respect to survival, side, size, ECMO needs, associated major cardiac malformations and liver position.
Results
3746 cases of CDH were entered in the registry between 2007 and 2015, with an overall survival of 71%. Of those, 68% had a prenatal diagnosis. Survival rates were significantly better in the postnatally diagnosed group, 83 vs 65%. There was a higher proportion of bigger defect sizes, C and D, in the prenatally diagnosed group, but the survival rates were similar when patients were stratified by defect size. The rate of ECMO utilization was higher overall in the prenatally diagnosed group, 33 vs 22%, but it was similar within similar defect sizes. Right-sided defects are more commonly missed at prenatal screening than left-sided CDH, 53 vs 35% (p